{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXSCOTUSCASE-RISPEP28","ticker":"KXSCOTUSCASE-RISPEP28","slug":"KXSCOTUSCASE-RISPEP28","title":"Will SCOTUS treat trademark strength as a factual question?","description":null,"image":null,"icon":null,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2026-07-24T00:00:00Z","end_date":"2028-08-01T14:00:00Z","closed_time":null,"volume":0.0,"volume_24hr":0.0,"volume_24h_change":null,"normalized_vol_24hr":null,"normalized_volume":null,"liquidity":null,"open_interest":0.0,"categories":["Politics"],"tags":[],"synthetic":false,"is_group":false,"group_key":null,"parent_event_id":null,"probability":null,"spread":null,"top_outcome":"Before Aug 1, 2028","top_outcome_probability":0.0,"top_outcome_prob_24h_change":0.0,"top_outcome_volume_24h_change":0.0,"updated_at":"2026-07-24T00:11:25.686849Z","fetched_at":"2026-07-24T00:11:25.686849Z","added_at":"2026-07-24T00:11:25.686849Z","url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxscotuscase/will-scotus-treat-trademark-strength-as-a-factual-question/kxscotuscase-rispep28","chart_24h":null,"markets":[{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXSCOTUSCASE-RISPEP28","event_id":"KXSCOTUSCASE-RISPEP28","slug":"KXSCOTUSCASE-RISPEP28","question":"Will the Supreme Court rule in favor of RiseandShine Corporation, d/b/a Rise Brewing in RiseandShine Corp. v. PepsiCo, Inc.","group_item_title":"Before Aug 1, 2028","description":"If the Supreme Court, in RiseandShine Corp. v. PepsiCo, Inc., rules trademark strength is a question of fact in determining likelihood of confusion under 15 U.S.C. § 1114, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThe Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that trademark strength is a question of fact in a likelihood-of-confusion analysis under 15 U.S.C. § 1114 after Issuance and before August 1, 2028. The market resolves to No if the Court holds that trademark strength is a question of law, characterizes it as a mixed question without holding that the trademark-strength determination is factual, dismisses the writ as improvidently granted, or otherwise dismisses, vacates, or remands the case without resolving the Question Presented on the merits. A remand following an express merits holding that trademark strength is a question of fact resolves to Yes.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.0,1.0],"probability":0.0,"spread":0.08000000000000007,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2026-07-24T00:00:00Z","end_date":"2028-08-01T14:00:00Z","closed_time":"2028-08-01T14:00:00Z","volume":0.0,"volume_24hr":0.0,"prob_24h_change":0.0,"volume_24h_change":0.0,"normalized_vol_24hr":null,"normalized_volume":null,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Politics"],"countries":["United States"],"updated_at":"2026-07-25T19:47:45.746967Z","fetched_at":"2026-07-25T19:47:45.746967Z","added_at":"2026-07-24T00:11:25.908998Z","url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxscotuscase/will-scotus-treat-trademark-strength-as-a-factual-question/kxscotuscase-rispep28","event_title":"Will SCOTUS treat trademark strength as a factual question?","chart_24h":[0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0]}],"_meta":{"attribution":"pdata.world — aggregated prediction-market data across 8 platforms","canonical_url":"https://pdata.world/events/kalshi/KXSCOTUSCASE-RISPEP28","as_of":"2026-07-25T22:56:43.193570Z","docs":"https://api.pdata.world/docs","cite_as":"According to pdata.world (tracking Kalshi): \"Will SCOTUS treat trademark strength as a factual question?\" — top market at 0% probability across 1 outcome","source_url":null}}