{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26","ticker":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26","title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","description":null,"image":null,"icon":null,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2025-12-13T15:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":null,"volume":415869.0,"volume_24hr":2167.35,"volume_24h_change":null,"normalized_vol_24hr":17.46475601196289,"normalized_volume":41.9984245300293,"liquidity":null,"open_interest":207488.83,"categories":["Culture"],"tags":[],"synthetic":false,"is_group":false,"group_key":null,"parent_event_id":null,"probability":null,"spread":null,"top_outcome":"Donald Trump","top_outcome_probability":0.27,"top_outcome_prob_24h_change":0.010000000000000009,"top_outcome_volume_24h_change":233.23,"updated_at":"2026-06-22T12:38:59.747724Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-22T12:38:59.747724Z","added_at":null,"url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","chart_24h":[549.32,548.61,539.37,570.54,571.83,619.66,517.03,801.65,803.9200000000001,851.26,845.26,696.15,701.43,890.82,975.46,1041.47,1217.14,1217.14,1287.24,1238.15,1238.15,1667.78,1656.8,1651.02,1651.02,1745.91,2124.66,2119.68,2167.35],"markets":[{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26-DT","event_id":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26-DT","question":"Will Donald Trump be Time Person of the Year in 2026?","group_item_title":"Donald Trump","description":"If Donald Trump is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThis will count towards the payout criterion: \nIf multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. \nThe person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. \nIf Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes.\n\nThis does NOT count towards the payout criterion: \nIf there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. \nIf “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.27,0.73],"probability":0.27,"spread":0.010000000000000009,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2025-12-13T15:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":"2027-01-01T04:59:00Z","volume":59216.48,"volume_24hr":243.7,"prob_24h_change":0.010000000000000009,"volume_24h_change":233.23,"normalized_vol_24hr":9.658382415771484,"normalized_volume":35.32697296142578,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Culture"],"countries":["United States"],"updated_at":"2026-06-22T13:45:24.379879Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-22T13:45:24.379879Z","added_at":null,"url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","event_title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","chart_24h":[0.26,0.26,0.26,0.24,0.24,0.24,0.24,0.24,0.26,0.24,0.24,0.27,0.27,0.27,0.27]},{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26-POP","event_id":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26-POP","question":"Will Pope Leo XIV be Time Person of the Year in 2026?","group_item_title":"Pope Leo XIV","description":"If Pope Leo XIV is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThis will count towards the payout criterion: \nIf multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. \nThe person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. \nIf Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes.\n\nThis does NOT count towards the payout criterion: \nIf there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. \nIf “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.2,0.8],"probability":0.2,"spread":0.010000000000000009,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2026-02-19T20:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":"2027-01-01T04:59:00Z","volume":36697.95,"volume_24hr":458.02,"prob_24h_change":0.020000000000000018,"volume_24h_change":360.79999999999995,"normalized_vol_24hr":11.994063377380371,"normalized_volume":32.3176155090332,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Culture"],"countries":[],"updated_at":"2026-06-22T10:14:01.043573Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-22T10:14:01.043573Z","added_at":null,"url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","event_title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","chart_24h":[0.18,0.18,0.18,0.17,0.17,0.17,0.17,0.19,0.19,0.19,0.19,0.18,0.18,0.18,0.18,0.18,0.18,0.18,0.18,0.2,0.2]},{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26-ZOH","event_id":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26-ZOH","question":"Will Zohran Mamdani be Time Person of the Year in 2026?","group_item_title":"Zohran Mamdani","description":"If Zohran Mamdani is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThis will count towards the payout criterion: \nIf multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. \nThe person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. \nIf Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes.\n\nThis does NOT count towards the payout criterion: \nIf there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. \nIf “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.18,0.8200000000000001],"probability":0.18,"spread":0.010000000000000009,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2026-02-19T20:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":"2027-01-01T04:59:00Z","volume":68894.53,"volume_24hr":1017.52,"prob_24h_change":-0.010000000000000009,"volume_24h_change":685.42,"normalized_vol_24hr":15.316235542297363,"normalized_volume":36.30694580078125,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Culture"],"countries":["United States"],"updated_at":"2026-06-22T13:46:50.647018Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-22T12:38:59.892020Z","added_at":null,"url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","event_title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","chart_24h":[0.19,0.19,0.19,0.19,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.18,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.18]},{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26-AI","event_id":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26-AI","question":"Will AI be Time Person of the Year in 2026?","group_item_title":"AI","description":"If AI is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThis will count towards the payout criterion: \nIf multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. \nThe person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. \nIf Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes.\n\nThis does NOT count towards the payout criterion: \nIf there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. \nIf “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.12,0.88],"probability":0.12,"spread":0.03,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2025-12-13T15:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":"2027-01-01T04:59:00Z","volume":109141.44,"volume_24hr":78.49,"prob_24h_change":0.03,"volume_24h_change":69.49,"normalized_vol_24hr":6.113011360168457,"normalized_volume":39.36759567260742,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Culture"],"countries":[],"updated_at":"2026-06-22T01:02:14.171845Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-22T01:00:45.589573Z","added_at":null,"url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","event_title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","chart_24h":[0.09,0.09,0.09,0.12]},{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26-BAD","event_id":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26-BAD","question":"Will Bad Bunny be Time Person of the Year in 2026?","group_item_title":"Bad Bunny","description":"If Bad Bunny is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThis will count towards the payout criterion: \nIf multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. \nThe person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. \nIf Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes.\n\nThis does NOT count towards the payout criterion: \nIf there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. \nIf “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.07,0.9299999999999999],"probability":0.07,"spread":0.04000000000000001,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2026-02-19T20:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":"2027-01-01T04:59:00Z","volume":59668.11,"volume_24hr":269.62,"prob_24h_change":0.010000000000000009,"volume_24h_change":196.62,"normalized_vol_24hr":10.015228271484375,"normalized_volume":35.37583923339844,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Culture"],"countries":[],"updated_at":"2026-06-22T06:33:10.931151Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-22T02:28:56.837695Z","added_at":null,"url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","event_title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","chart_24h":[0.06,0.06,0.06,0.03,0.03,0.08,0.07,0.07]},{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26-GPT","event_id":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26-GPT","question":"Will ChatGPT be Time Person of the Year in 2026?","group_item_title":"ChatGPT","description":"If ChatGPT is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThis will count towards the payout criterion: \nIf multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. \nThe person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. \nIf Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes.\n\nThis does NOT count towards the payout criterion: \nIf there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. \nIf “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.05,0.95],"probability":0.05,"spread":0.020000000000000004,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2025-12-13T15:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":"2027-01-01T04:59:00Z","volume":11395.48,"volume_24hr":10.0,"prob_24h_change":0.0,"volume_24h_change":0.0,"normalized_vol_24hr":1.8358373641967773,"normalized_volume":25.526107788085938,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Culture"],"countries":[],"updated_at":"2026-06-22T11:07:49.959490Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-22T06:18:38.345036Z","added_at":null,"url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","event_title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","chart_24h":[0.05,0.05,0.05,0.05,0.05]},{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26-MOH","event_id":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26-MOH","question":"Will Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf be Time Person of the Year in 2026?","group_item_title":"Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf","description":"If Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThis will count towards the payout criterion: \nIf multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. \nThe person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. \nIf Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes.\n\nThis does NOT count towards the payout criterion: \nIf there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. \nIf “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.05,0.95],"probability":0.05,"spread":0.039999999999999994,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2026-05-21T23:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":"2027-01-01T04:59:00Z","volume":147.0,"volume_24hr":90.0,"prob_24h_change":0.0,"volume_24h_change":90.0,"normalized_vol_24hr":6.4966936111450195,"normalized_volume":7.305465221405029,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Culture"],"countries":["Iran"],"updated_at":"2026-06-22T07:11:05.756677Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-22T07:11:05.756677Z","added_at":"2026-05-21T22:28:01.488011Z","url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","event_title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","chart_24h":[0.05,0.05,0.05]},{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26-EM","event_id":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26-EM","question":"Will Elon Musk be Time Person of the Year in 2026?","group_item_title":"Elon Musk","description":"If Elon Musk is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThis will count towards the payout criterion: \nIf multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. \nThe person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. \nIf Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes.\n\nThis does NOT count towards the payout criterion: \nIf there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. \nIf “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.15,0.85],"probability":0.15,"spread":0.03,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2025-12-13T15:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":"2027-01-01T04:59:00Z","volume":12639.76,"volume_24hr":0.0,"prob_24h_change":0.0,"volume_24h_change":-4.98,"normalized_vol_24hr":null,"normalized_volume":26.095579147338867,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Culture"],"countries":[],"updated_at":"2026-06-22T12:14:21.048509Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-22T12:12:51.184354Z","added_at":null,"url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","event_title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","chart_24h":[0.15,0.15,0.15,0.15,0.15,0.15]},{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26-JAM","event_id":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26-JAM","question":"Will James Talarico be Time Person of the Year in 2026?","group_item_title":"James Talarico","description":"If James Talarico is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThis will count towards the payout criterion: \nIf multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. \nThe person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. \nIf Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes.\n\nThis does NOT count towards the payout criterion: \nIf there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. \nIf “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.1,0.9],"probability":0.1,"spread":0.04000000000000001,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2026-05-18T21:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":"2027-01-01T04:59:00Z","volume":1160.53,"volume_24hr":0.0,"prob_24h_change":0.0,"volume_24h_change":0.0,"normalized_vol_24hr":null,"normalized_volume":14.571130752563477,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Culture"],"countries":["United States"],"updated_at":"2026-06-22T11:47:49.988238Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-18T23:37:03.938101Z","added_at":"2026-05-18T20:58:01.711305Z","url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","event_title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","chart_24h":[0.1,0.1]},{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26-CHR","event_id":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26-CHR","question":"Will Christina Koch be Time Person of the Year in 2026?","group_item_title":"Christina Koch","description":"If Christina Koch is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThis will count towards the payout criterion: \nIf multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. \nThe person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. \nIf Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes.\n\nThis does NOT count towards the payout criterion: \nIf there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. \nIf “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.09,0.91],"probability":0.09,"spread":0.03,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2026-05-06T22:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":"2027-01-01T04:59:00Z","volume":218.14,"volume_24hr":0.0,"prob_24h_change":0.0,"volume_24h_change":0.0,"normalized_vol_24hr":null,"normalized_volume":8.498126983642578,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Culture"],"countries":[],"updated_at":"2026-06-22T13:46:50.647018Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-21T12:41:44.771541Z","added_at":"2026-05-06T19:45:16.448808Z","url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","event_title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","chart_24h":null},{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26-DAR","event_id":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26-DAR","question":"Will Dario Amodei be Time Person of the Year in 2026?","group_item_title":"Dario Amodei","description":"If Dario Amodei is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThis will count towards the payout criterion: \nIf multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. \nThe person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. \nIf Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes.\n\nThis does NOT count towards the payout criterion: \nIf there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. \nIf “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.09,0.91],"probability":0.09,"spread":0.020000000000000004,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2026-03-30T16:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":"2027-01-01T04:59:00Z","volume":5073.07,"volume_24hr":0.0,"prob_24h_change":0.0,"volume_24h_change":0.0,"normalized_vol_24hr":null,"normalized_volume":21.2952938079834,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Culture"],"countries":[],"updated_at":"2026-06-22T13:46:50.647018Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-21T12:41:44.771541Z","added_at":null,"url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","event_title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","chart_24h":null},{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26-BEN","event_id":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26-BEN","question":"Will Benjamin Netanyahu be Time Person of the Year in 2026?","group_item_title":"Benjamin Netanyahu","description":"If Benjamin Netanyahu is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThis will count towards the payout criterion: \nIf multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. \nThe person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. \nIf Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes.\n\nThis does NOT count towards the payout criterion: \nIf there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. \nIf “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.08,0.92],"probability":0.08,"spread":0.020000000000000004,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2026-05-06T22:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":"2027-01-01T04:59:00Z","volume":515.49,"volume_24hr":0.0,"prob_24h_change":0.0,"volume_24h_change":0.0,"normalized_vol_24hr":null,"normalized_volume":11.416765213012695,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Culture"],"countries":["Israel"],"updated_at":"2026-06-21T15:55:56.704789Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-21T15:55:56.704789Z","added_at":"2026-05-06T19:45:16.448808Z","url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","event_title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","chart_24h":null},{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26-JER","event_id":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26-JER","question":"Will Jeremy Hansen be Time Person of the Year in 2026?","group_item_title":"Jeremy Hansen","description":"If Jeremy Hansen is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThis will count towards the payout criterion: \nIf multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. \nThe person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. \nIf Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes.\n\nThis does NOT count towards the payout criterion: \nIf there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. \nIf “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.08,0.92],"probability":0.08,"spread":0.04,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2026-05-06T22:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":"2027-01-01T04:59:00Z","volume":75.93,"volume_24hr":0.0,"prob_24h_change":0.0,"volume_24h_change":0.0,"normalized_vol_24hr":null,"normalized_volume":5.517611503601074,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Culture"],"countries":[],"updated_at":"2026-06-21T16:21:53.082444Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-21T16:21:53.082444Z","added_at":"2026-05-06T19:45:16.448808Z","url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","event_title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","chart_24h":[0.08,0.08]},{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26-SA","event_id":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26-SA","question":"Will Sam Altman be Time Person of the Year in 2026?","group_item_title":"Sam Altman","description":"If Sam Altman is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThis will count towards the payout criterion: \nIf multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. \nThe person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. \nIf Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes.\n\nThis does NOT count towards the payout criterion: \nIf there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. \nIf “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.08,0.92],"probability":0.08,"spread":0.03,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2025-12-13T15:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":"2027-01-01T04:59:00Z","volume":15305.21,"volume_24hr":0.0,"prob_24h_change":0.0,"volume_24h_change":0.0,"normalized_vol_24hr":null,"normalized_volume":27.16358757019043,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Culture"],"countries":[],"updated_at":"2026-06-21T15:17:27.710258Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-21T15:17:27.710258Z","added_at":null,"url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","event_title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","chart_24h":null},{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26-VIC","event_id":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26-VIC","question":"Will Victor Glover be Time Person of the Year in 2026?","group_item_title":"Victor Glover","description":"If Victor Glover is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThis will count towards the payout criterion: \nIf multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. \nThe person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. \nIf Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes.\n\nThis does NOT count towards the payout criterion: \nIf there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. \nIf “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.08,0.92],"probability":0.08,"spread":0.009999999999999995,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2026-05-06T22:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":"2027-01-01T04:59:00Z","volume":191.75,"volume_24hr":0.0,"prob_24h_change":0.0,"volume_24h_change":0.0,"normalized_vol_24hr":null,"normalized_volume":8.098301887512207,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Culture"],"countries":["United States"],"updated_at":"2026-06-22T06:31:39.057580Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-22T06:31:39.057580Z","added_at":"2026-05-06T19:45:16.448808Z","url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","event_title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","chart_24h":[0.08,0.08,0.08,0.08]},{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26-JP","event_id":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26-JP","question":"Will Jerome Powell be Time Person of the Year in 2026?","group_item_title":"Jerome Powell","description":"If Jerome Powell is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThis will count towards the payout criterion: \nIf multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. \nThe person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. \nIf Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes.\n\nThis does NOT count towards the payout criterion: \nIf there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. \nIf “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.06,0.94],"probability":0.06,"spread":0.020000000000000004,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2025-12-13T15:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":"2027-01-01T04:59:00Z","volume":13976.96,"volume_24hr":0.0,"prob_24h_change":0.0,"volume_24h_change":-1.05,"normalized_vol_24hr":null,"normalized_volume":26.654205322265625,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Culture"],"countries":["United States"],"updated_at":"2026-06-22T06:59:23.853302Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-22T06:58:18.649913Z","added_at":null,"url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","event_title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","chart_24h":[0.06,0.06]},{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26-REI","event_id":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26-REI","question":"Will Reid Wiseman be Time Person of the Year in 2026?","group_item_title":"Reid Wiseman","description":"If Reid Wiseman is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThis will count towards the payout criterion: \nIf multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. \nThe person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. \nIf Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes.\n\nThis does NOT count towards the payout criterion: \nIf there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. \nIf “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.05,0.95],"probability":0.05,"spread":0.07,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2026-04-08T16:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":"2027-01-01T04:59:00Z","volume":3549.95,"volume_24hr":0.0,"prob_24h_change":0.0,"volume_24h_change":0.0,"normalized_vol_24hr":null,"normalized_volume":19.550806045532227,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Culture"],"countries":[],"updated_at":"2026-06-22T11:59:24.348918Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-22T11:59:24.348918Z","added_at":null,"url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","event_title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","chart_24h":[0.05,0.05,0.05]},{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26-SHE","event_id":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26-SHE","question":"Will Shehbaz Sharif be Time Person of the Year in 2026?","group_item_title":"Shehbaz Sharif","description":"If Shehbaz Sharif is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThis will count towards the payout criterion: \nIf multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. \nThe person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. \nIf Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes.\n\nThis does NOT count towards the payout criterion: \nIf there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. \nIf “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.04,0.96],"probability":0.04,"spread":0.05,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2026-04-08T14:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":"2027-01-01T04:59:00Z","volume":503.96,"volume_24hr":0.0,"prob_24h_change":0.0,"volume_24h_change":0.0,"normalized_vol_24hr":null,"normalized_volume":11.334394454956055,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Culture"],"countries":["Pakistan"],"updated_at":"2026-06-22T11:59:24.348918Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-22T11:59:24.348918Z","added_at":null,"url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","event_title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","chart_24h":[0.04,0.04,0.04,0.04]},{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26-MAR","event_id":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26-MAR","question":"Will Marco Rubio be Time Person of the Year in 2026?","group_item_title":"Marco Rubio","description":"If Marco Rubio is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThis will count towards the payout criterion: \nIf multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. \nThe person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. \nIf Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes.\n\nThis does NOT count towards the payout criterion: \nIf there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. \nIf “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.03,0.97],"probability":0.03,"spread":0.039999999999999994,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2026-05-06T22:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":"2027-01-01T04:59:00Z","volume":368.24,"volume_24hr":0.0,"prob_24h_change":0.0,"volume_24h_change":0.0,"normalized_vol_24hr":null,"normalized_volume":10.22303581237793,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Culture"],"countries":["United States"],"updated_at":"2026-06-22T05:12:53.375096Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-22T05:12:53.375096Z","added_at":"2026-05-06T19:45:16.448808Z","url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","event_title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","chart_24h":[0.03,0.03]},{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26-PET","event_id":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26-PET","question":"Will Péter Magyar be Time Person of the Year in 2026?","group_item_title":"Péter Magyar","description":"If Péter Magyar is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThis will count towards the payout criterion: \nIf multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. \nThe person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. \nIf Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes.\n\nThis does NOT count towards the payout criterion: \nIf there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. \nIf “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.03,0.97],"probability":0.03,"spread":0.030000000000000006,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2026-05-21T23:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":"2027-01-01T04:59:00Z","volume":67.98,"volume_24hr":0.0,"prob_24h_change":0.0,"volume_24h_change":0.0,"normalized_vol_24hr":null,"normalized_volume":5.243923664093018,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Culture"],"countries":["Hungary"],"updated_at":"2026-06-22T10:27:27.749110Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-22T10:27:27.749110Z","added_at":"2026-05-21T22:14:41.529191Z","url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","event_title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","chart_24h":[0.03,0.03,0.03,0.03,0.03,0.03,0.03]},{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26-TS","event_id":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26-TS","question":"Will Taylor Swift be Time Person of the Year in 2026?","group_item_title":"Taylor Swift","description":"If Taylor Swift is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThis will count towards the payout criterion: \nIf multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. \nThe person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. \nIf Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes.\n\nThis does NOT count towards the payout criterion: \nIf there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. \nIf “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.03,0.97],"probability":0.03,"spread":0.010000000000000002,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2025-12-13T15:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":"2027-01-01T04:59:00Z","volume":16347.37,"volume_24hr":0.0,"prob_24h_change":0.0,"volume_24h_change":0.0,"normalized_vol_24hr":null,"normalized_volume":27.536224365234375,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Culture"],"countries":[],"updated_at":"2026-06-22T09:10:18.389841Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-22T00:09:15.912455Z","added_at":null,"url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","event_title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","chart_24h":[0.03,0.03,0.03]},{"source":"kalshi","id":"KXTIME-26-ALY","event_id":"KXTIME-26","slug":"KXTIME-26-ALY","question":"Will Alysa Liu be Time Person of the Year in 2026?","group_item_title":"Alysa Liu","description":"If Alysa Liu is Time Person of the Year for 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.\n\n---\n\nThis will count towards the payout criterion: \nIf multiple persons win, all persons that are listed are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. If, for example, the Person of the Year is “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”, both “Joe Biden” and “Kamala Harris” strikes are encompassed within the Payout Criterion. \nThe person must be explicitly named as the Person of the Year or pictured on the/a relevant cover if they are associated with the group/concept winning (the picture is only relevant for a natural human being winning). Some examples to illustrate this: “Jamal Khasogghi” would resolve to Yes in 2018, when “The Guardians” won, as he is also named and shown on a cover and falls within “The Guardians”. Similarly, “Bill Gates” would resolve to Yes in 2005. \nIf Time uses language that does not specifically refer to a person or organization (examples being 2018’s “The Guardians of Truth” or 2017’s “The Silence Breakers”), Kalshi will resolve markets to the most simple meaning reasonable. In those cases, “Journalists” and “the Me Too movement” would resolve to Yes.\n\nThis does NOT count towards the payout criterion: \nIf there is no Person of the Year (and instead many variations thereof, e.g. Entertainer of the Year, Hero of the Year), that is not encompassed in the Payout Criterion. \nIf “ChatGPT” was the Person of the Year, strikes of “AI” or “LLMs” would resolve to No, since even if they are conceptually linked, they are not synonymous (and thus are not explicitly named), and are not persons, so it would not matter if they were identified in the image. Or if “Sam Altman” was the Person of the Year, and the cover showed a person using ChatGPT on their computer, “ChatGPT” would not resolve to Yes because it is not a person.","image":null,"icon":null,"outcomes":["Yes","No"],"outcome_prices":[0.02,0.98],"probability":0.02,"spread":0.039999999999999994,"active":true,"closed":false,"start_date":"2026-05-06T22:00:00Z","end_date":"2027-12-31T15:00:00Z","closed_time":"2027-01-01T04:59:00Z","volume":713.67,"volume_24hr":0.0,"prob_24h_change":0.0,"volume_24h_change":-15.5,"normalized_vol_24hr":null,"normalized_volume":12.634664535522461,"liquidity":null,"categories":["Culture"],"countries":[],"updated_at":"2026-06-22T06:19:55.094887Z","fetched_at":"2026-06-22T06:18:38.345036Z","added_at":"2026-05-06T19:45:16.448808Z","url":"https://kalshi.com/markets/kxtime/times-person-of-the-year-for-2026/kxtime-26","event_title":"Time's Person of the Year for 2026","chart_24h":[0.02,0.02]}],"_meta":{"attribution":"pdata.world — aggregated prediction-market data across 8 platforms","canonical_url":"https://pdata.world/events/kalshi/KXTIME-26","as_of":"2026-06-22T13:52:54.319436Z","docs":"https://api.pdata.world/docs","cite_as":"According to pdata.world (tracking Kalshi): \"Time's Person of the Year for 2026\" — top market at 18% probability across 22 outcomes","source_url":null}}